![]() |
F-4C Phantom II 63-7666 'This One's for You Baby' from the 171st FIS, 191st FIG Michigan ANG taxi's back to the ramp after completing a Profile IV mission. This profile was practically the only time the aircraft were seen sporting tanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
All
the 191st Rhino's at WT84 carried nose art: 63-7583 'Never Trust a Smiling Cat' 63-7412 'We Bad!' 63-7595 'Make My Day' 63-7442 'Baby!' This along with the colorful yellow/Black checks made these jets very popular with photographers and modellers alike. |
|
©
Alec Molton/Premier Aviation Auctions![]() |
William
Tell is* the USAF's premier fighter competition.
Officially designated the 'USAF Air to Air Weapons Meet' William Tell was
first held at Yuma, Arizona in 1954 (as part of the USAF Fighter Gunnery &
Weapons Meet). In 1958 it moved to it's current home of Tyndall AFB, Florida.
The
competition is normally conducted every two years and was originally for units
of Air Defence Command but was eventually expanded to incorporate air defence
units from other commands, the Air National Guard as well as Canada. The
naming of an overall winner started in 1980 and in 1996 the teams stopped
competing as units but instead represented their various commands, such as
Air Force Reserve, Air National Guard.
Report:Peter
Greengrass Photos:Alec Molton (unless noted) |
The competition involves the various units flying a range of intercept profiles against manned aircraft, as well as live-firing against sub-scale and full-scale aerial targets (FSAT). This is subdivided into aircraft types, 1984 involved McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagles (Category I), McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II's (Category II) and Convair F-106 Delta Dart's (Category III). The competition is not just limited to the aircrew but also consists of separate contests for the unit's weapon controllers, maintenance personnel and weapons loaders.
William Tell 1984 was notable for a couple of reasons, this was the last year that Convair F-106 Delta Dart equipped units competed (in later years the 'Ultimate Interceptor' still participated as a TARGET!) and this was also the first appearance of the QF-100 as an unmanned target replacing not only the PQM-102's but also the sub-scale BQM-34 'Firebee'. 1984 was also the first year since 1963 that the Canadian Armed Forces did not send a team to compete.
William tell '84 comprised of 12 teams from five USAF commands or subordinate organizations. The only command to have problems deciding which units to send to Tyndall, was Air Defence Tactical Air Command (ADTAC). With 17 ADTAC and ADTAC gained ANG Interceptor Squadron's to choose from and only 7 available places, the command decided to hold a competition - named the 'William Tell 84 Shootoff' - to select the units to be sent to Tyndall. This comprised of a series of one day evaluations held during May 1984. The other commands choices were much easier, for example PACAF only had one wing flying F-15's and TAC sent all of it's F-15 Wings!.
Each unit's team comprised of 5 aircraft and crews (4 primary aircraft/crews plus 1 spare), maintenance/weapon loader personnel and a weapons controller team. The Weapons Controller Teams selected were from units that normally worked with the Squadron, group or Wing, and are listed in the following tables in green.
Profile
I/II 'Live Fire'
Profiles I and II were parts of the same mission.
The teams flew these profiles as two ship elements, with each element flying
the mission twice.
Profile I was a frontal radar missile attack against an unmanned manoeuvring QF-100 FSAT.
Profile
II
was an IR missile attack from the rear on the same target.
Missions were flown with live missiles but with the warhead removed. The elements were also accompanied by a chase plane for range safety.
Profile
III 'Cold Fire'
The aim of this profile was to test the teams
ability to scramble (teams were allowed 16 minutes from the 'horn' sounding
to getting airborne), identify and engage 2 manned targets. The interceptors
launched in pairs. Each aircraft was fitted with 2 simulated IR missiles and
2 Radar missiles. Each target had to be 'killed' by an IR and Radar missile
therefore one interceptor could 'kill' both targets if necessary.
Profile
IV 'Cold Fire'
This profile involved the teams (all 4 aircraft)
attempting to intercept a massed raid involving manned targets (at various
altitudes/speeds). Targets used ECM and chaff to evade and a typical target
force comprised of 3 F-111's, 2 B-52's, 2 T-33's (for ECM) and 2 F-106's (simulating
cruise missiles and ECM aircraft). Each team aircraft was equipped with 3
simulated missiles and 12 targets (some targets did multiple passes through
exercise area to provide the 12 targets) were to be engaged, therefore to
obtain maximum points all shots had to be on target.
Profile
V 'Live Fire'
Live fire aerial gunnery profile against Low
Cost Tow Targets (LCTT). This was limited to Active duty units. The aim was
for each aircraft to hit the target in a minimum time then score maximum hits.
Each 'shooter' was limited to 150 rounds.
There was a total of 40,000 points available, spread between Profiles I,II,III and IV. The total profile scores were used to select the winning team. The awards were split in to team and aircrew awards.
The
team awards were 'Top team' and 'Category Best Team', which was awarded to
the top Category I,II and III teams (F-15,F-4 and F-106). The individual aircrew
scores selected the 'Top Gun' award and also the the top gun award for each
aircraft category.
The support troops - Maintenance,Weapon Loaders and the Weapon Control teams
- also competed for awards and trophy's.
Profile V selected the 'Top Aerial Gunner' and 'Top Aerial Gunnery Team' from the active duty units.
Various other awards were awarded by the various contractors. Among these were the Airframe manufacturers, Sperry Corporation (QF-100 drone conversions) and Cubic Corporation responsible for the ACMI (Aircraft Combat Manoeuvring Instrumentation) range equipment used at Tyndall.
Team |
Aircraft
|
Profile I | Profile II | Profile III | Profile IV | Total | Profile V |
33rd
TFW/TAC
|
F-15C | 8240 | 5840 | 9750 | 9100 | 32930 | 981 |
49th
TFW/TAC
|
F-15A | 7360 | 8145 | 9650 | 7300 | 32455 | 2510 |
142nd FIG/ANG | F-4C | 7300 | 9310 | 9250 | 6500 | 32360 | - |
1st TFW/TAC | F-15C | 7860 | 7275 | 9750 | 6500 | 31385 | 718 |
119th FIG/ANG | F-4D | 6120 | 6890 | 9600 | 7850 | 30460 | - |
32 TFS/USAFE | F-15C | 5740 | 6865 | 7725 | 9100 | 29430 | 0 |
318th FIS/ADTAC | F-15A | 6180 | 5500 | 9700 | 7200 | 28580 | 458 |
18th TFW/PACAF | F-15C | 6120 | 8895 | 5000 | 8200 | 28215 | 1158 |
177th FIG/ANG | F-106A | 5180 | 3800 | 8950 | 8300 | 26230 | - |
191st FIG/ANG | F-4D | 4620 | 6930 | 4000 | 8300 | 23850 | - |
87th FIS/ADTAC | F-106A | 1680 | 3585 | 9300 | 8200 | 22765 | 527 |
102nd FIW/ANG | F-106A | 3000 | 1890 | 9000 | 7500 | 21390 | - |
FINAL SCORES
As can be seen from the table below the 33rd TFW won the 'Top Team' trophy, they also took top honours in the F-15 aircraft category. Capt. Scott 'Stork' Turner from the 32nd TFS was named 'Top Gun'. The 87th FIS won the 'Top Weapons Load' award and then it was 33rd TFW all the way, winning the maintenance awards and also their weapons controllers - the 507th TACW - took the award for 'Top Control Team'.
In the active duty only category of aerial gunnery, the 49th TFW were top dogs with a points total of 2510, 884 of these provided by Capt. Doug M Fraser who was named 'Top Aerial Gunner'.
WT84 QF-100 Drone Kills & Hits | ||||||||
Date | QF-100D |
Shooter
|
Fate/Remarks | |||||
Serial/Code | Type | Serial | Unit | Crew | Weapon | |||
12/10/84 | 56-3044/125 | F-15C | 79-0026 | 32 TFS | Capt. S Turner | AIM-9 | KILL/F-15
Chase First kill of meet |
|
13/10/84 | 56-3410/135 | F-15 | ? | 18 TFW | ? | AIM-9 | HIT | |
F-4 | ? | 191 FIG | ? | AIM-9 | HIT/Recovered | |||
18/10/84 | 56-3253/127 | F-4C | 63-7532 | 142 FIG | Capt.
L Kemp (Pilot) Capt. R Peterson (WSO) |
AIM-7 | KILL/F-15 Chase missed Self destructed | |
18/10/84 | 56-3251/124 | F-4C |
76-0776 |
142
FIG |
LtCol.
R Pilcher (Pilot) Maj. D Anderson (WSO) |
AIM-9 |
HIT | |
F-15C | ? | 1 TFW | Capt. Carl Van Pelt | AIM-9 | KILL - F-15 Chase (Gun) | |||
19/10/84 | 55-2949/146 | F-15C | 78-0479 | 18 TFW | Capt. J Catton | AIM-7 | KILL/Destroyed First unassisted kill of meet |
|
19/10/84 | 55-2898/143 | F-15C | ? | 33 TFW | Capt. E Cantwell | AIM-7 | KILL/Destroyed | |
20/10/84 | 55-3564/148 | F-15A | 76-0008 | 318 FIS | Capt. R Hill | AIM-9 | HIT/Recovered | |
22/10/84 | 56-3313/129 | F-15A | 76-0101 | 318 FIS | Capt. D Darnell | AIM-7 | KILL/Self
destructed Last kill of meet |
166
TFS/121 TFW A-7D (x3) Profile III Target aircraft |
16
TFS/388 TFW F-16A (x3) Profile III Target aircraft |
For interceptors to do their job they need targets, and at William Tell '84 Tactical Air Command provided quite a variety of target aircraft for the meet. Based at nearby bases (see map) were A-7's, F-4's, F-16's and F-111's, which along with Tyndall based F-15's, T-33's and deployed F-106's made up the target package's for Profiles III/IV. Strategic Air Command weren't to be left out neither, providing two B-52 targets for each Profile IV evaluation. These launched from their Bomb Wings respective home bases and were flown as normal training missions by the crews.
Profiles I/II were the 'live fire' parts of the meet and this was where the old 'Huns' earned their money. QF-100D FSAT's flew 24 sorties during October in support of WT84 and only eight times did they fail to return (see table below for a list of these) An interesting side story to this concerns QF-100D 55-3564 named 'Carl's Hun' which was hit and lost a wing tip but recovered to Tyndall on Saturday 20th October. On that day it was being 'flown' by RCA Service Company contractor Carl Jeffcoat (The drones were operated by this company on behalf of the 82 TATS) who twenty years earlier had flown this same aircraft on his first assignment.
None the less important as the target aircraft were the support aircraft based at Tyndall. Moody F-4E's were deployed for Profile V as target tugs, whilst Tyndall's own 325th Tactical Training Wing (TTW) F-15's and T-33A's flew numerous sorties as Range patrols and Chase aircraft. Especially sought after, was the opportunity to fly chase on Profiles I/II where the chase might be called in to finish of a damaged drone (Lt Col Doug Weidman found himself in just this situation on the 12th October and got some 'gun time' on QF-100D 56-3044)
This 'Those Were the Days 03' could of not been possible without two things, one a book by John M Deur 'William Tell 84' published by Aeolus Publishing Limited and the slides shot by Alec Molton of Premier Aviation Auctions (Then as proprietor of Mil-Slides) which I have the privilege of having in my collection. Therefore we would like to offer our thanks to these two gentlemen as well as the following guys in the 'fraternity' ; Doug Slowiak, Daniel Soulaine, Steve Hill, Don Logan and Tom Hildreth.
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
524
TFS/27 TFW F-111D (x6) Profile IV Target aircraft |
70
TFS/347 TFW F-4E (x2) Profile III Target aircraft |
82
TATS/475 WEG QF-100D (x17+) Profile I/II Target |
325
TTW F-15A/B (x29+) Profile III Target/Range Patrol/Chase |
95
FITS/325 TTW T-33A (x7+) Profile IV Target/Range Patrol |
5
FIS/49 FIS/159 FIS F-106A (x9) Profile III/IV Target aircraft |
70
TFS/347 TFW F-4E (x4) Profile V Target Tug Support |
38
ARRS, Det5/39 ARRW CH-3E (x3) SAR |
![]() |
The
competition aircraft and teams weren't the only aircraft and units taking
part, Tactical Air Command supplied various aircraft to operate as targets
for the meet. Hover mouse over Bases to find out which units and aircraft
were based at each location in support of William Tell 84. For more info concerning these units see Targets & Support Below |